

April 2, 2009
March 4, 2009
February 3, 2009
March 30, 2007
February 17, 2007
January 23, 2007
January 26, 2006
January 13, 2006
March 30, 2005
February 2, 2005
January 27, 2005
April 26, 2004
February 13, 2004
February 5, 2004
January 12, 2004
June 11, 2003
May 9, 2003
April 23, 2003
March 24, 2003
February 25, 2003
February 3, 2003
May 17, 2002
April 9, 2002
Feb. 26, 2002
Feb. 12, 2002
Jan. 30, 2002
Jan. 11, 2002
Sept. 25, 2001
May 21, 2001
March 5, 2001
January 31, 2001
Feb. 15, 2000
Jan., 25, 2000
Dec. 25, 1999
Nov. 2, 1999
Sept. 7, 1999
May 10, 1999
April 8, 1999
March 16, 1999
February 12, 1999
January 22, 1999
November 3, 1998
March 19, 1998
February 6, 1998
January 20, 1998
April 30, 1997
April 3, 1997
March 13, 1997
February 24, 1997
Please note:
After reading a report, click your browser's back button to return to this page.
|
| LEGISLATIVE REPORT #4 |
May 1, 2009 |
J. Pat Thompson
Deputy Director
|
THE 105 REGULAR SESSION came to a close Sunday, April 26. Everything that needed to pass (operating and capital budgets) were approved. But the Governor is considering calling them back for a short special session to deal with a handful of issues that weren’t handled, namely school levies and criminal sentencing. There is no doubt some lawmakers who want to expand the list of issues to consider so it’s a “wait and see” game for now.
AS REPORTED PREVIOUSLY, we were successful in preventing a funding method change that would have harmed the stability of our pension systems. However, the budget that was passed did artificially lower rates and that will no doubt lead to increased future cost. To be clear, money that should be going to lower the unfunded liability of Plan I will be spent on balancing the state’s current budget. While this means lower rates for everyone now, it will mean higher rates in the future.
Hopefully, our employers will use this money to help offset cuts that affect our membership, that is layoffs, furloughs, and so on.
We also strongly encourage everyone to consider putting the savings from this change into their deferred compensation programs.
The rates are listed below:
|
PENSION RATES
|
|
|
CURRENT
|
ADOPTED
|
|
|
7/1/08 - 6/30/09
|
7/1/09 - 6/30/11
|
|
Plan 1 Employer
|
8.31%
|
5.29%
|
|
Plan 1 Employee
|
6.00%
|
6.00%
|
|
Plan 2 Employer
|
8.31%
|
5.29%
|
|
Plan 2 Employee
|
5.45%
|
3.89%
|
|
Plan 3 Employer
|
8.31%
|
5.29%
|
|
Plan 3 Employee
|
5 to 15%
|
5 to 15%
|
|
SERS 2 Employer
|
7.54%
|
5.43%
|
|
SERS 2 Employee
|
4.68%
|
3.14%
|
|
SERS 3 Employer
|
7.54%
|
5.43%
|
|
SERS 3 Employee
|
5 to 15%
|
5 to 15%
|
|
PSERS Employer
|
9.43%
|
7.84%
|
|
PSERS Employee
|
6.57%
|
6.55%
|
Bid limit bill becomes law
|
IN A SWEEPING UPDATE to our state’s outdated bid limits, HB 1847 passed overwhelmingly. This will allow our employers to utilize in house labor to perform small construction projects instead of contracting the work out, saving everyone time and money. See chart below:
|
|
HB 1847
|
|
|
Class
|
Current Project Limit
|
New Project Limit
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Class Cities
|
$70,000
|
$90,000
|
|
2nd Class Cities
|
$45,000
|
$65,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Counties over 400,000 Population
|
$70,000
|
$90,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
These limits haven't been updated for decades
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fire Districts
|
$2,500
|
$20,000
|
|
Park Districts
|
$5,000
|
$20,000
|
|
Utility Districts
|
$10,000
|
$20,000
|
|
Hospital Districts
|
$50,000
|
$70,000
|
Interruptive military service credit HB 1548
|
THIS BILL allows for a total of 5 years, no cost service credit to any PERS, SERS or PSERS member who provides proof that they left employment for interruptive military service during a period of war and returned to that employment 90 days after being discharged. The Governor signed this bill on April 24.
Eyman's sugar daddy shows up again!
|
MR. MICHAEL DUNMIRE, the deep pocket for Tim Eyman’s temper tantrums, dropped another $300,000 to buy signatures for Initiative 1033.
This latest offering from the “Anti Government” crowd will further limit revenue for state and local governments. Eyman claims that the limits will account for inflation and population growth. The problem is that the cost of running essential services does not follow the same rules of the initiative!
Several factors such as the recession/depression we are currently experiencing will artificially lower base revenue that inflation would be tied to.
With the $300,000 from Dunmire and the $195,000 Eyman claims to have “loaned” the campaign, paid gatherers will no doubt buy enough signatures to qualify. We are in the process of bringing people and organizations together to counter this shortsighted measure. More later.
|
|
Legislative report
by e-mail
If you would like to receive the Legislative Report by e-mail, please complete the form below.
|
|