Gain-sharing lawsuit threatens Early Retirement Factors (ERFs)by Council 2 Deputy Director Pat Thompson on August 12, 2013
The final step in the year’s long battle over the repeal of gain-sharing will begin on October 24 when the Supreme Court hears oral arguments. To recap, gain-sharing was a provision (gimmick) in Plan 3 that called for all returns “gains” over 10% in a four-year period to be split between Plan 3 members and the employer. Example: If the State Investment Board average rate of return for a 4 year period was 12%, Plan 3 employees would receive a 1% one-time payment and so would their employer.Once the state hired a real actuary, it was determined that not only is this a bad idea, it will also cost the entire system billions of dollars because it would have to be pre-funded. In other words, the state would have to siphon money off the top even in bad times to pay out money in good times.
Your union lobbied hard to create a more stable benefit and retirement system that didn’t include gain-sharing but did include dramatically lowering the penalty for retiring with 30 years of service.
(See archived report for details)
Although we were very pleased with the change that benefited our members, Council 28 (State Employees) and the Washington Education Association (Teachers) sued the State to reinstate Gain-sharing. The lower Superior Court has ruled that:
- The State must restore gain-sharing.
- The State can repeal the ERF improvements.
We have been monitoring this issue since it began and will keep you posted as details become available. Don’t hesitate to contact J. Pat Thompson at 1-800-775-6418 or email@example.com if you have any questions or concerns.